Talk:History of rail transport in Italy

Latest comment: 4 years ago by 31.198.75.25 in topic From 1980s onwards

Requested move edit

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the proposal was moved. --BDD (talk) 23:21, 4 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

History of railways in ItalyHistory of rail transport in Italy – Proposed new name conforms with applicable naming convention for other articles in this series, eg History of rail transport in Austria, History of rail transport in Switzerland. Bahnfrend (talk) 16:05, 21 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

  • Comment. Per ngrams, the phrase rail transport is very rarely used. Railways is far, far more common. Despite that, this is the only article in the category that uses railway. Apteva (talk) 01:32, 22 May 2013 (UTC)Reply
    • The expression "rail transport" is used in English Wikipedia as a compromise between / substitute for "railroads", which is used in North America, and "railways", which is used in Commonwealth nations (except Canada) and Ireland, and has a different meaning in North America (where it means companies that operate railroads). Bahnfrend (talk) 02:12, 22 May 2013 (UTC)Reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

" ... the trains ran on time" edit

Do we have to allow Wikipedia to be used to push this old myth? I heard this was never really true, and indeed a number of sources ([1], [2], and [3], for starters) suggest this is at best greatly exaggerated and at worse Fascist propaganda that refuses to die. What are the sources for the existing, totally uncited text? Daniel Case (talk) 17:08, 30 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on History of rail transport in Italy. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:39, 5 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

Prewar FFSS edit

Prewar acronym FFSS is still used today on parliamentary acts. --Robertiki (talk) 13:31, 27 July 2018 (UTC)Reply

From 1980s onwards edit

https://www.agi.it/cronaca/alta_velocita_classifica_mondo-6042506/news/2019-08-19/

not bad for a state in which the transportation speed in the south is still comparable to that of the early 19th century (40km/h). Maybe you have exaggerate just a little (!). I recommend to modify the paragraph by including the fact that we are talking about the seventh global high-speed rail system. Alex64--31.198.75.25 (talk) 09:02, 3 October 2019 (UTC)Reply