Talk:History of amateur radio

Latest comment: 11 months ago by TedfromNC in topic Errors in the Wiki page on Amateur Radio

Reference number 14, which links to the Radio Society of Great Britain's 'History' page seems to be a dead link. I cannot find the page on the RSGB website. Perhaps RSGB have taken it down? 78.105.145.181 (talk) 11:14, 4 November 2008 (UTC)Reply

Robert Moore wrote a three-part article in R/9 magazine describing SSB theory in 1933-1934. He did not claim to have constructed an SSB rig, nor did he claim to run any SSB "experiments." FLAHAM (talk) 17:11, 31 May 2011 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on History of amateur radio. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 01:07, 19 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on History of amateur radio. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:40, 3 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

NATO bombing of Yugoslavia

edit

In the Late 20th century section, I've had to remove obvious WP:COATRACKing, such as [1] and [2] where activities of Yugoslav hams during the 1999 bombing are used as a platform for claims of inflated numbers of civilians killed by NATO, hams referring to NATO as "the enemy", NATO deliberately targeting ham radio operators, etc. The claims are not supported by WP:RS, and in one case, the text cited to Human Rights Watch showed no mention of ham radio operators whatsoever. - LuckyLouie (talk) 20:17, 1 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on History of amateur radio. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:06, 5 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

Lead section

edit

The lead section is intended to be a summary of what is in the article, not an article unto itself. This article is about the *history of amateur radio*, which is a subset of the main topic. I’ve had to remove extensive explanation of what ham radio is from the lead section. All of it was unsourced, and appeared to be personal reflection and opinion. A pointer to the main article is a better option. - LuckyLouie (talk)

Errors in the Wiki page on Amateur Radio

edit

I just reviewed the Wiki page on Amateur Radio and found sone errors. Such as: from my extensive research, I found the first easily built radio circuit was published in 1899 by Prof. Green of Notre Dame (not early 1900s), the first college amateur radio club to be started at Harvard in 1905, not at Columbia, and I also found from century old reports and magazines that hams were talking around the world around the 1922-1923 time frame. I found such detailed information while researching a series of invited articles that I wrote for IEEE Communications Society, titled "Crucible of Communications." You may see part 1 and part 2, which have heavily researched facts, at these links, and I would suggest that some of the prose be changed to reflect these facts. I do not have time to do it myself, and rarely view Wiki pages. I hope this is useful.

Part 2: https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?tp=&arnumber=10328195

Part 1: https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?tp=&arnumber=9928087 TedfromNC (talk) 12:43, 13 December 2023 (UTC)Reply