Talk:History of Saint Paul, Minnesota

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Version 0.7 edit

This article has been nominated for Version 0.7 of the offline Wikipedia release but did not meet the standards for importance. It has been put on Wikipedia:Release_Version_Nominations/Held_nominations for further review. Please see that page for details.

Although this article is nice, it is of a little lower importance IMHO than the corresponding Minneapolis one, and also this has not passed as a GA; I'd say it falls just outside the scope of this release. It will be considered for future releases. Walkerma (talk) 04:02, 23 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

Observation: discussion that should be expanded edit

I was noticing how terse the Early settlement and Early boom years sections are and noticing that these sections are missing some really interesting aspects of the town's early history. A quote about the streets of the town in the 1840s:

[One would see] the blankets and painted faces of Indians, and the red sashes and mocassins of French voyageurs and half-breeds, greatly predominating over the less picturesque costume of the Anglo-American race.

— Governor Alexander Ramsey, 1853

Some of the aspects that IMHO should be discussed more are the following:

  • The fact that Saint Paul's early settlers were largely Métis (the article vaguely implies this by mentioning Selkirk but, frankly, most readers would have no idea about any of that). St. Paul maintained this mixed race character more than and longer than most of the major communities in the mid 1800s.
  • The role of the Roman Catholic Church. Because of the Métis and other francophones Catholic influence was very strong in the town even after Prostestantism became dominant in most other "white" communities in the area.
  • The fact that the town became a major steamboat landing because it was the point furthest north on the Mississippi that steamboats could land conveniently. This really is the major reason the town developed so rapidly.
  • The role of the Red River Trails in the early economy.
  • 1856 is an especially key year to mention. That year the Mississippi communities had a massive tourist boom with the city's hotels registering 28,000 people, compared to the town's population of perhaps 6000-8000 (see Williams, A history of the city of Saint Paul to 1875, p. 365). According to Williams so much new construction was completed that year that the town began to look like a city instead of just a pioneer town.

--Mcorazao (talk) 15:32, 10 December 2009 (UTC)Reply

Language issues Questionable POV in spots, non-standard use of commas, whole section duplicated.130.19.32.235 (talk) 20:27, 10 November 2014 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on History of Saint Paul, Minnesota. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:28, 13 January 2017 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on History of Saint Paul, Minnesota. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:31, 3 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 14 external links on History of Saint Paul, Minnesota. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:26, 22 May 2017 (UTC)Reply