Talk:History of Oradea

Latest comment: 7 years ago by Wiae in topic Copyright problem removed

Not verified infos? edit

Pls, specify them!--fz22 08:54, 5 January 2006 (UTC)Reply

to merge or not to merge edit

I think Oradea deserves a separate History of article. Eg.History of Timisoara. --fz22 10:53, 25 November 2006 (UTC)Reply

Name change edit

I did not change every Oradea listing but the established practice (see the Danzig/Gdansk debates) is to use both names of the city in the article (i.e Danzig before 1945, Gdansk after 1945) This would be fitting for this case as all the medeival dates refer to Nagyvárad or Grosswardrein, not to Oradea. After Trianon it should be referred to as Oradea. Any objections? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.224.28.2 (talk) 14:55, 2 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

We must not forget that Nagyvárad was given to Romania in the Diktat of Trianon in 1921, Nagyvárad was part of Hungary, it had never been part of Romania until it was given to Romania. No plebiscites were allowed in Nagyvárad, as the population of Nagyvárad was over 90% Hungarian and its inhabitants would have voted to remain part of Hungary as they did in the only plebiscite permitted that took place in Sopron western Hungary. Consequently Nagyvárad artificially became Oradea.

Copyright problem removed edit

Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://tikvah.ro/en/jews-in-oradea/history.html. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)

For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, providing it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. /wiae /tlk 13:36, 9 October 2016 (UTC)Reply