Talk:History of Lisbon

When Lisbon came under Visigothic rule?

The Suebi took Lisbon first time in or around 448 but lost it 456 when a Visigothic intervention restored the Roman administration. In 469 the Suebi took Lisbon again. However, it seems the city came under Visigothic rule even before the final incorporation of the Suebi kingdom (585). So when exactly Lisbon did fall in Visigothic hands? --Roksanna (talk) 06:54, 10 July 2011 (UTC)

Article needs cleaning and re-work

As per an editor suggestion I’ve read this article. In my opinion the article is more about Portugal than about Lisbon. I would recommend to follow other examples like the article on the History of London. The article has an additional problem, it is a patchwork of dozens of different sources, some of them not related to Lisbon at all. It would be better to base the article on a reduced but solid number of good books. In addition a lot of important people on Lisbon’s history are left out (e.g. Duarte Pacheco) and important events like the several Lisbon earthquakes are ignored. A good source can also be found at the city of Lisbon website, here [1]. This article from the City of Lisbon is truly a good article.J Pratas 18:41, 5 March 2015 (UTC)

Carlstak I have made some bold editing on the "New State" section. I do thing the article needs to be more about the History of Lisbon and much less about Portugal. Before proceeding with any major similar rework I would like to have some feed back on the radical change I've made.J Pratas 14:58, 7 March 2015 (UTC)

Timeline of Lisbon

What is missing from the recently created city timeline article? Please add relevant content. Contributions welcome. Thank you. -- M2545 (talk) 15:01, 19 May 2015 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on History of Lisbon. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140621220603/http://www.cm-vfxira.pt/files/3/documentos/2013091715584601248.pdf to http://www.cm-vfxira.pt/files/3/documentos/2013091715584601248.pdf
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20161013091642/http://anthropologyworldnews.tamu.edu/faculty/castro/publications/Wachsmann%20et%20al.%202009%20-%20Portugal.pdf to http://anthropologyworldnews.tamu.edu/faculty/castro/publications/Wachsmann%20et%20al.%202009%20-%20Portugal.pdf
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140831014947/http://www.americanbridge.net/Experience/experience_detail.php?prj_ab_id=TaguLisb04082004160422675 to http://www.americanbridge.net/Experience/experience_detail.php?prj_ab_id=TaguLisb04082004160422675
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160524104422/http://museudacidade.pt/ to http://www.museudacidade.pt/
• Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.museuteatroromano.pt/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:09, 4 November 2017 (UTC)