Talk:History of Delta Air Lines/Archive 2

Archive 1Archive 2

What's the point?

Of this article? This is essentially a copy and paste of the Delta article and all this information is available there. There are no dedicated history pages to the other airlines and Delta should be no different. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 12.158.161.102 (talk)

Uh, no, it was a cut-and-paste. The Delta article was getting very long - 102 KB total. Splitting is permitted for long articles of any type, and was discussed on several occasions in the past year. - BilCat (talk) 11:25, 17 September 2009 (UTC)
And it is not duplicated the history section has been removed from the main article, also note at least three other History of Foo Airline type articles exist (like History of Air New Zealand), true not very common but it is acceptable to create sub-articles when the main article gets to big. MilborneOne (talk) 11:42, 17 September 2009 (UTC)
Just like to add that a similar thing has happened over on British Airways, where the history section had become as big as half the article! It isn't a discouraged practice, as long as the amount of content had exceeded a certain point to be worthy of an article in its own right, for a lot of modern startups this isn't the case, hence many airlines do not have History spinoffs. So I would state that it is both uncommon, but not unheard of, and this practice is applicable in a few circumstances; at least as far as my judgement goes. Kyteto (talk) 13:46, 27 December 2009 (UTC)
And really the same could be said for United, American, etc.... 168.215.99.163 (talk) 00:59, 23 August 2013 (UTC)

The New Georgia Encyclopedia ("NGE") has authorized Wikipedia to import and/or merge eleven articles, which I have copied to project space; one of these is Wikipedia:WikiProject Georgia (U.S. state)/New Georgia Encyclopedia/Delta Air Lines (which is primarily directed at the history of the company).

Our goal is to get the NGE articles in top shape and merge or move them into mainspace as quickly as possible. If this turns out well (as I am confident it will), the NGE will likely permit us to import their remaining body of over 2,000 well-researched and well-written articles, which could pioneer a trend for other private owners of encyclopedic content to release their materials into our corpus. I would deeply appreciate any help that we can muster in accomplishing this. Please note that the original NGE article (linked in the required attribution section of the above article in project space) has images, but NGE is unable to convey those to us at this time, as they are individually licensed by NGE. Cheers! bd2412 T 16:44, 14 February 2010 (UTC)

The image File:DL-NW Tails.svg is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check

  • That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
  • That this article is linked to from the image description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --05:53, 12 February 2011 (UTC)

The link below provided as a citation has been dead for >2 years and I could not find a replacement.

<ref>[http://www.keepdeltamydelta.org/getObjectReal_Deal.aspx?Name=Issue2]{{Dead link|date=March 2009}}</ref>

--User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 15:16, 3 February 2013 (UTC)

A second link which has been dead for >2 years and could not be replaced.

<ref>[http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/ap/fn/4509363.html ]{{Dead link|date=March 2009}}</ref>

--User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 15:24, 3 February 2013 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on History of Delta Air Lines. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 13:47, 26 February 2016 (UTC)