Talk:History of Bombay in independent India

India: Maharashtra / Mumbai / History Low‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Maharashtra (assessed as Mid-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Mumbai (assessed as High-importance).
	This article is supported by the Indian history workgroup (assessed as Low-importance).

History Low‑importance

	History portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the subject of History on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Historyhistory articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Requested move

Latest comment: 13 years ago11 comments10 people in discussion

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

No consensus to move. Vegaswikian (talk) 19:02, 15 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

History of Bombay in Independent India → History of Mumbai in Independent India — Currently (in Independent India), Bombay is called Mumbai. The parent article is called History of Mumbai. --Redtigerxyz ^Talk 13:32, 8 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

Oppose as exercise in anachronism; move the parent article. The official change of name was in the 1990s; during most of the independence of India, this city was called Bombay. It would be far more useful to include the date (and perhaps the unfortunate circumstances) and to cite the continuing local usage. Septentrionalis PMAnderson 04:26, 9 January 2011 (UTC)Reply
Oppose: During most of the period in Independent India (~ 50 years), the city was known as Bombay; as compared to Mumbai (~15 years). The parent article might be called History of Mumbai, because the city was known as Bombay only during the British period and most of Independent India. 1000s of years before, prior to the British period, during Islamic and indigenous empire rule, the city was not known as Bombay. Hence, we name the parent article as History of Mumbai as a general convention. Xavier449 (talk) 10:18, 9 January 2011 (UTC)Reply
Oppose for now. Let's move it in 2043, when it will have been "Mumbai" for at least half the period in question. (Among the siblings of this article are History of Bombay under Portuguese rule (1534–1661) and History of Bombay under British rule; they're surely not to be moved, which shows that the name of the parent article is not determiner. Shreevatsa (talk) 16:18, 9 January 2011 (UTC)Reply
Oppose. Have a look at the content of the article: most of it is about Mumbai before the renaming. I think it should be 'Bombay' in the article name. TheMike •^{Wassup doc?} 12:18, 11 January 2011 (UTC)Reply
Support Wikipedia guidelines are that when considering a place over a period of time, we use the current name. Hence we have History of Gdańsk, not History of Danzig; History of Tokyo, not History of Edo; History of New York City, not History of New Amsterdam and History of Istanbul, not History of Constantinople. When we refer exclusively to a specific past time period when the city was known by a different name, then we normally use the old name. Skinsmoke (talk) 02:53, 12 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

Well, that's good reason for why History of Bombay should be History of Mumbai (as it indeed is), but this article refers exclusively to a specific time period, during most of which it was "Bombay". I do see the argument for thinking of the article, since it barely touches the present, as looking back from the present, but I don't feel it's sufficiently strong… Shreevatsa (talk) 05:31, 12 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

Support We should use the correct government name in the present day for a living city like Mumbai. Zuggernaut (talk) 04:40, 12 January 2011 (UTC)Reply
Oppose per PMAnderson above; since the name change has been recent and the city was known by the name Bombay for most of the period since Indian independence, I think it would be generally anachronistic to use Mumbai in the title. Also, regarding History of Mumbai, I think Skinsmoke's reply above would hold good. Regards, SBC-YPR (talk) 09:24, 12 January 2011 (UTC)Reply
Oppose City has been Mumbai for just about 15 years, was Bombay for over 200 hence makes sense to keep it as Bombay for now. Around The Globe^{सत्यमेव जयते} 06:18, 14 January 2011 (UTC)Reply
Request The inclusion of information following the 1960's and before the twentieth century.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

External links modified

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on History of Bombay in independent India. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:01, 3 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

External links modified

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on History of Bombay in independent India. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081006221033/http://www.maharashtra.gov.in/english/community/community_samyuktaShow.php to http://www.maharashtra.gov.in/english/community/community_samyuktaShow.php

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:37, 4 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

External links modified

Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on History of Bombay in independent India. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:17, 4 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

Add topic