 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Older comments edit
First I thought about nominating this page for deletion, since it contained only spam, but now I thought of a better idea, creating a redirect to Historicism. Crix 03:08, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
- How about not doing that. There is a big difference between the both.
re-ligating? edit
Where the article says "re-ligating", does it perhaps mean to say "relegating"? "Re-ligating" makes no sense to me at all. - Jmabel | Talk 23:00, 16 November 2009 (UTC)
Second sentence edit
It is reasonably clear from the second sentence, beyond which I have no intention of reading, that this is a translation of the German text: 'pronounce' is a possible translation of 'hervorheben', but is unsuitable in this context, 'emphasize' being preferable. Pamour (talk) 11:42, 9 August 2011 (UTC)
The latter part of the following quoted sentence is ambiguous if not erroneously formulated, perhaps another form of the word "affection" is intended. "It pronounces the historicity of man, his binding to tradition, and the awareness of humans affection by their past." — Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.228.97.88 (talk) 10:36, 2 February 2013 (UTC)