 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
This page as it stood earlier today was a bit of a mess: no structure, often repeating itself, containing text cut almost verbatim from one of its citations (http://www.glaucus.org.uk/Hippocrepis_comosa.html).
I recently spent considerable time tidying it up, adding structure and sections, and starting to add some "Citation needed"s where reasonable: I think the result was at least an improvement on the current stream of consciousness! But all my work has been reverted, without any explanation.
Why was this? It would be good to know, so that I don't bother wasting my time in future!
Eustatius (talk) 21:02, 12 December 2016 (UTC)
- Ah, I've hopefully spotted it now and fixed! It looks like the use of {{subst:DATE}} in the {{Citation needed|{{subst:DATE}}}} template does NOT work the way suggested on https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:Citation_needed . It was adding a lot of cruft, generally about what dates might mean very generally, on Wikipedia. But it was only adding it after I saved changes, not during the preview. Helpful!
- Eustatius (talk) 21:15, 12 December 2016 (UTC)