Hindus in Siberia edit

I heard a while back there were Hindus in Siberia. They were of Mongoloid origin. A Hindu priest from India went to Siberia and poured a vial of the Ganges in a river. Wish I save the article. --Dangerous-Boy 07:52, 13 January 2006 (UTC)Reply

Mayor Of Russia edit

Who is this 'Mayor Of Russia'? Kapil 15:16, 24 August 2006 (UTC)Reply

Lists edit

Is a list of the ISKCON and other temples necessary? We can instead list a number of temples, and maybe their locations if they are needed. Shruti14 ( talkcontribs ) 18:55, 14 August 2007 (UTC)Reply

'Western Interpretation?' edit

Why is ISKCON charged with a 'western interpretation of Hinduism?' ISKCON has a disciplinic succession that can be traced back to Chaitanya Mahaprabhu, and it IS NOT a western creation as these Christians would love to beleive. I think this comment should be taken down, since it is offensive and completely concocted. I read the source material, but nowhere does Mr Kotin mention HOW it is a 'western interpretation'.

The practises of the Hare Krishna movement are quite different from those of mainstream Hinduism, but this difference does not originate in the west, but in fact in India. I see no reason why this man's uninformed opinion should be posted on wikipedia as some kind of fact.

Harrifer (talk) 09:39, 8 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

IT has been over two months and no reply, so I will remove the content, since it is most certainly not encyclopaedic. -Harrifer- (forgot my login) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.157.181.161 (talk) 13:59, 1 November 2008 (UTC)Reply

Further research shows that Mr Kotin was also incorrect that it is specifically Iskcon that is disliked by the Russian Orthodox church. In a letter to the mayor of Moscow, the Russian Orthodox Archbishop referred to Krishna as a 'demon'. Clearly this shows that the leadership of the Orthodox church hate Hinduism in general, and not just the Gaudiya Vaisnava movement. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Harrifer (talkcontribs) 15:16, 1 November 2008 (UTC)Reply

New material put in 'controversy' section, along with two sources. If I haven't edited this properly, feel free to change it.Harrifer (talk) 15:36, 1 November 2008 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Hinduism in Russia. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:06, 4 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion edit

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 23:08, 10 February 2023 (UTC)Reply