Talk:Himmelbjerget

Unreferenced-tag

I now opt for removing the Unreferenced-tag. I have supplied sources and references RhinoMind (talk) 01:02, 7 July 2014 (UTC)

I have now removed the ref-improve tag. RhinoMind (talk) 11:31, 18 September 2014 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Himmelbjerget. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140714134738/http://pub.uvm.dk/2008/democracycanon/kap20.html to http://pub.uvm.dk/2008/democracycanon/kap20.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:31, 4 November 2017 (UTC)

Prominence

This article claims that Himmelbjerget is "much more impressive than" than Møllehøj in terms of [Topographic prominence]. But the article on [Møllehøj] lists it's prominence as 161m, which is significantly greater than Himmelbjerget's prominence, which, while not listed, is by definition less than it's height, which is listed at 147m. I'm going to remove the unsourced claim about having more impressive prominence. If anyone has any good references that can clear the matter up, please clarify further. 72.66.107.22 (talk) 23:08, 23 June 2023 (UTC)