 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Notability edit
So what makes this play notable? Jezhotwells (talk) 19:00, 15 July 2011 (UTC)
- Significant coverage in reliable sources. Phil Bridger (talk) 19:29, 15 July 2011 (UTC)
- Your reference also says, "Multiple sources are generally expected." "ack of multiple sources suggests that the topic may be more suitable for inclusion in an article on a broader topic. It is common for multiple newspapers or journals to publish the same story, sometimes with minor alterations or different headlines, but one story does not constitute multiple works. Several journals simultaneously publishing different articles does not always constitute multiple works, especially when the authors are relying on the same sources, and merely restating the same information. Similarly, a series of publications by the same author or in the same periodical is normally counted as one source." Jezhotwells (talk)
- More sources exist, as you will find if you look for them, but are not needed in the article because everything in it is verified. Phil Bridger (talk) 21:43, 15 July 2011 (UTC)
- Your reference also says, "Multiple sources are generally expected." "ack of multiple sources suggests that the topic may be more suitable for inclusion in an article on a broader topic. It is common for multiple newspapers or journals to publish the same story, sometimes with minor alterations or different headlines, but one story does not constitute multiple works. Several journals simultaneously publishing different articles does not always constitute multiple works, especially when the authors are relying on the same sources, and merely restating the same information. Similarly, a series of publications by the same author or in the same periodical is normally counted as one source." Jezhotwells (talk)