Talk:Highest organ of state power

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Political parties task force.

Law Low‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Socialism Low‑importance

	Socialism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Socialism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of socialism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SocialismWikipedia:WikiProject SocialismTemplate:WikiProject Socialismsocialism articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

The power of the highest organ of state power edit

Latest comment: 5 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hi!

@HangingCurve: Sorry that I reverted you! I'm been busy the whole day - today I handed in my thesis!

As for the power of the highest organ of state power, I think your addition is confusing. Generally for the following reasons:

While most highest organs of state power have not had the freedom to counteract party policies, some have, such as the Yugoslav Assembly, the Laotian Assembly and the Vietnamese Assembly.. Of course, these assemblies do not rebel against communist power, but they make their powers felt.
Another example is the Congress of People's Deputies under Gorbachev which was very much a debating body which rebelled against communist power.
You are right that in some instances, especially under Stalin and Mao, the ruling party did not even bother calling in formal sessions of the highest organ of state power and party decisions became de facto law. However, in post-Stalin USSR and in present-day China this is seldom the case.
NPC does have the ability to improve and amend party policies and documents somewhat, or at least work through them. But the most important decisions are usually adopted. But here again we have little knowledge. We do know that the Central Committee adopted policy A and then the NPC did the same a couple of days later, but we do not know if the NPC did not work on the proposal for policy A earlier as well.
I will try to expand this article, but I will focus on the communist state article in the coming days.

TheUzbek (talk) 13:11, 10 November 2023 (UTC)Reply