Talk:High Speed 2 Phase Two

I don't wish to bore readers yet again with the "Liverpool problem", but it is surely significant enough to be worthy of a mention. Thus:

1) Liverpool is by far the largest English city not to be connected to HS2; 2) Liverpool has several dedicated organizations (e.g. 20 Miles More & Linking Liverpool) committed to establishing a link between the city and HS2; 3) Liverpool (uniquely) has offered its own taxpayers' money to establish a connection with HS2, a proposal which the government has rejected; 4) Liverpool, post HS2, will have fewer seats per hour to London than any other English Core City; 5) Liverpool, post HS2, will have a poorer service to Birmingham than it does today (according to proposals by Centro, the West Midlands Transport Authority); 6) According to KPMG, Liverpool is the only Core City whose economy may be damaged by HS2, possibly by as much as £50 million per annum); 7) HS2 offers minimal additional capacity to Merseyside's rail network, despite passing within 5 miles of its boundaries, thus compromising the development of Liverpool's docks and logistics industries;

Yes, it's true that many other cities will not receive a High Speed link, but no other city is so large, so close to the high speed line, and so obviously disadvantaged by being excluded. The mere fact that this has become such a controversial issue surely justifies a mention in itself. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 185.108.92.23 (talk) 16:46, 5 December 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on High Speed 2 Phase Two. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130518065740/http://www.manchestereveningnews.co.uk/news/greater-manchester-news/trafford-council-chiefs-lobby-ministers-1230363 to http://www.manchestereveningnews.co.uk/news/greater-manchester-news/trafford-council-chiefs-lobby-ministers-1230363
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110316215516/http://menmedia.co.uk/manchestereveningnews/news/transport/s/1410661_manchester_airport_may_be_highspeed_rail_network_hub to http://menmedia.co.uk/manchestereveningnews/news/transport/s/1410661_manchester_airport_may_be_highspeed_rail_network_hub

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:16, 2 April 2017 (UTC)

Too much on Manchester

There is quite a lot on Manchester centre and airport while Leeds and the east section is relegated to links. Either link Manchester or get Leeds in the article in depth. 2A01:4B00:881D:3700:9C95:80DB:C951:873B (talk) 10:11, 3 May 2019 (UTC)