Talk:High Roller (Ferris wheel)

Article Tone

The article appears to have been largely created anonymously by ostensibly a "group" of anonymous editors, which is acceptable in itself, but edits have brought a highly promotional tone to the article. All editors are invited to become registered editors of Wikipedia. In the meantime, the tone of the article needs to be non-promotional. Regardless of how the event was marketed, for example, when the lights on the attraction were inaugurated, there is no reason to highlight in the article that it was a "ceremony," which is largely a way for marketers of the attractive to create hype for the opening. 842U (talk) 22:21, 19 April 2014 (UTC)

As this is now growing contentious, rather than continually reverting the article, please discuss the reasoning for reverting the article here. We can bring in other experienced editors to arbitrate, as required.842U (talk) 21:39, 21 April 2014 (UTC)

Fragment with missing information

The opening sentence for the article section "design" is a fragment, with a missing object... "High Roller was announced in August 2011[10] as the centerpiece[11] of Caesars Entertainment Corporation's $550 million The LINQ.[7] Arup Engineering, which previously consulted on the Singapore Flyer, acted as the structural engineer.[5]"

550 million what? I'm not qualified to say, not living in Las Vegas... — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.130.185.175 (talk) 21:38, 19 August 2017 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on High Roller (Ferris wheel). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20151020234820/http://english.eastday.com/e/120727/u1a6736090.html to http://english.eastday.com/e/120727/u1a6736090.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131109061753/http://www.jrn.com/ktnv/news/Las-Vegas-High-Roller-Observation-Wheel-reaches-new-heights-230866461.html to http://www.jrn.com/ktnv/news/Las-Vegas-High-Roller-Observation-Wheel-reaches-new-heights-230866461.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:25, 3 November 2017 (UTC)

"Seating Capacity" - infobox is a wee bit misleading... *Capacity* is as given, but there are far fewer seats. Most space is standing/wheel-char space, not seating.

This is *probably* OK, this is an Encyclopedia, not a seating chart, but if there is an easy way to make this less confusing, it might be kind to our readers.Shajure (talk) 04:10, 21 December 2020 (UTC)