Talk:High-Tech Employee Antitrust Litigation

Latest comment: 3 years ago by 24.143.229.211 in topic 'Intel' Frame

Importance rating edit

Until we know more about the scope of the suit, and how it affects the economy of cali, we cannot give it a high rating for the cali/sfba projects. this needs a lot more information, aside from its rating.Mercurywoodrose (talk) 00:27, 29 October 2013 (UTC)Reply

Title edit

This isn't a proper noun or official/formal title, so shouldn't the article title be lower case (High-tech employee antitrust litigation)?--ukexpat (talk) 20:35, 26 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

There's no magic formula to what makes something a proper noun, but to me High-Tech Employee Antitrust Litigation is, in the appropriate context, perfectly acceptable as a proper noun in the same way that other borderline examples like "Cuban Missile Crisis" are acceptable proper nouns. Rolf H Nelson (talk) 02:33, 27 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

'Intel' Frame edit

There is a frame with information on Intel corporation at the bottom of this article. It appears out of place and unrelated to the article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.143.229.211 (talk) 07:43, 9 July 2020 (UTC)Reply