Talk:Hess triangle

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Hess triangle. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160614205814/http://gothamist.com/2010/11/01/teeny_tiny_private_piece_of_land.php to http://gothamist.com/2010/11/01/teeny_tiny_private_piece_of_land.php
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150409183637/http://gothamist.com/2015/04/09/hess_triangle_history.php to http://gothamist.com/2015/04/09/hess_triangle_history.php

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:27, 3 November 2017 (UTC)

"$2 an inch"

I removed the "$2 per square inch" phrasing even though there were two different references using that figure. For the given dimensions the triangle has an area of 310sqin. I suspect the earlier source (NYTimes) calculated the area of a 2 foot square (488sqin) the second source copied NYTimes. What are current best practices when dealing with factually incorrect citations? —dgies^t_c 20:28, 29 May 2020 (UTC)

Is it possible that the plaque isn't the entirety of the plot? There's a concrete border around the plaque, which might account for the missing 190in². pburka (talk) 21:00, 29 May 2020 (UTC)

The only sources I've seen agree on the triangle's dimensions as 27.5"/27.5"/25.5". Can you find any sources which support a larger measurement? A more recent NYTimes article reports 27"/25", and the $1000 price, but dropped the "$2/inch" phrase. To get to 500sqin we'd be talking a triangle about 33"-35" on a side, and I can't find any references supporting that size. —dgies^t_c 22:14, 29 May 2020 (UTC)

In 1928, the plot was described as measuring "three feet each way".[1] If you look at the photo of the plaque, you can see that the concrete triangle extends 3 or 4 inches further in each direction. I don't know what is correct, but it's plausible that the plaque is smaller than the plot. pburka (talk) 20:49, 30 May 2020 (UTC)

$100 vs $1000

the source [7] behind paywall is reference for the $100 in the english wiki version. others mention $1000 and find references like BBC https://www.bbc.com/travel/article/20190314-new-yorks-cheeky-symbol-of-defiance Guess we can be better than factor 10 uncertainty here ;)