Talk:Hernando Siles

Latest comment: 1 year ago by EdJohnston in topic Requested move 17 January 2023

Requested move 17 January 2023 edit

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: Both moved. EdJohnston (talk) 03:12, 27 January 2023 (UTC)Reply


– Namesake of both the other articles and thus should take predominance. Krisgabwoosh (talk) 06:02, 17 January 2023 (UTC) Krisgabwoosh (talk) 06:02, 17 January 2023 (UTC) This is a contested technical request (permalink). Rotideypoc41352 (talk · contribs) 21:50, 17 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

Copied from RMTR by Rotideypoc41352 (talk · contribs) 21:50, 17 January 2023 (UTC)Reply
  • @Krisgabwoosh: An article about a 1 term president that has 0 references is the primary topic? Given that the province article doesn't mention the person, and the stadium has a good handful of references, it doesn't seem like the person is primary. I suggest holding a full discussion, as that can generate some updates to these articles and sort out the primacy better. (If you need help setting up a multi-page RM, I can assist.) UtherSRG (talk) 12:22, 17 January 2023 (UTC)Reply
    @UtherSRG: I'd appreciate if you could help set that up as multi-page requested moves are something I'm not too familiar with. Krisgabwoosh (talk) 16:05, 17 January 2023 (UTC)Reply
End of RMTR comments. Rotideypoc41352 (talk · contribs) 21:50, 17 January 2023 (UTC)Reply
  • Comment I guess I'll be the first comment. To just re-state my argument, I think that Hernando Siles, the namesake of both the province and stadium, is clearly the primary topic. I don't think the lack of citations for the article should really affect that, either. As kind of a ridiculous hypothetical, if the article for John F. Kennedy were a stub with no citations and the article for John F. Kennedy Stadium were a featured article, I still think the former would be obviously the primary topic, even if the article is lower-quality. For those still apprehensive due to this article's quality, I do eventually intend to bring it up to GA status, and am currently collecting the necessary citations and bibliography. Krisgabwoosh (talk) 03:10, 18 January 2023 (UTC)Reply
Note: WikiProject Bolivia has been notified of this discussion. Rotideypoc41352 (talk · contribs) 07:16, 18 January 2023 (UTC)Reply
  • Support, politician is PRIMARY and per COMMONNAME. However, looks like the page could be greatly expanded.--Ortizesp (talk) 16:58, 18 January 2023 (UTC)Reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.