Talk:Heraclea Minoa

Greece Mid‑importance

	Greece portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Greece, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Greece on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GreeceWikipedia:WikiProject GreeceTemplate:WikiProject GreeceGreek articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Classical Greece and Rome Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Classical Greece and Rome, a group of contributors interested in Wikipedia's articles on classics. If you would like to join the WikiProject or learn how to contribute, please see our project page. If you need assistance from a classicist, please see our talk page.Classical Greece and RomeWikipedia:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeTemplate:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeClassical Greece and Rome articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Archaeology Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Archaeology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Archaeology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchaeologyWikipedia:WikiProject ArchaeologyTemplate:WikiProject ArchaeologyArchaeology articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Cities

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cities, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of cities, towns and various other settlements on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CitiesWikipedia:WikiProject CitiesTemplate:WikiProject CitiesWikiProject Cities articles

Phoenicia Low‑importance

	Phoenicia portal This article is within the scope of the WikiProject Phoenicia, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Phoenicia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.PhoeniciaWikipedia:WikiProject PhoeniciaTemplate:WikiProject PhoeniciaPhoenicia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Alt names edit

Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Removed these from the lead

Hêrakleia Minôia: Eth. Rhachlôtês, Heracliensis

since they don't seem to make any sense. I guess the first is a bad/irregular Greek translit and the last might be a diocese? In any case, if any editor wants to restore them, kindly explain what they mean and place them in the appropriate place. The Greek translit doesn't go with an Italian name in the middle and the diocese name doesn't go in the lead of the city article. — LlywelynII 16:46, 1 December 2018 (UTC)Reply

Punic name edit

Latest comment: 5 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

Well, Huss (1985), p. 566 offers his opinion that Heraclea Minoa was probably known to the Carthaginians as RŠMLQRT (=Punic: 𐤓𐤔‬𐤌‬𐤋𐤒𐤓𐤕 = Rush Melqart = "Cape Melqart") in

Huss, Werner (1985), Geschichte der Karthager, Munich: C.H. Beck. (in German)

but I guess I'll park this on the talk page since Cefalù on the other side of the island currently has that name. It might be that there were two Rush Melqarts or it might be that Huss's identification has been shown incorrect on the basis of further excavation &c. — LlywelynII 17:11, 1 December 2018 (UTC)Reply

Well, fwiw,

Chaker, Salem; et al. (2017), "RUS- (<RO´Š), Préfixe Punique", Encyclopédie Berbère, vol. Vol. XL, Louvain: Peeters, pp. 7101–7103 {{citation}}: |volume= has extra text (help). (in French)

doesn't give any cites of its own but also baldly states that Heraclea Minoa was Cape Melqart to the Punics. — LlywelynII 13:56, 7 December 2018 (UTC)Reply

Ršmlqrt is only known from coinage - which site it should be identified with is widely discussed, but I don't think that there is a generally accepted opinion. At some point, Ršmlqrt should probably have its own wikipedia page. In the meanwhile, 'was probably known as' or 'may have been known as' strikes me as an acceptable description of Herakleia Minoa. Furius (talk) 18:37, 7 December 2018 (UTC)Reply

Add topic