Talk:Her Majesty's Wizard

Latest comment: 13 years ago by Snowybeagle in topic Not notable?

Insanity? edit

"Any student of Catholicism will quickly see their studies reflected in the lives and actions of the characters." Has Wikipedia been taken over by christians? This article needs to be seriously rewritten to adhere to quality standards. This is not a objective summary of the book. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.166.11.82 (talk) 07:06, 15 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

Not notable? edit

This series is not Harry Potter which spawned movies, but it is a worthy endeavour at fantasy fiction, married with real-world literature and religion. Snowybeagle (talk) 03:05, 9 July 2010 (UTC)Reply

Notability's guideline is too subjective and too narrowly interpreted. Many articles on fantasy novels such as Terry Brooks' Landover series could be considered as lacking references and notability under certain interpretation. Snowybeagle (talk) 02:40, 15 July 2010 (UTC)Reply
So you don't deny the article fails to meet the criteria, but instead claim the criteria are at fault? Incredible. 69.181.249.92 (talk) 14:42, 15 July 2010 (UTC)Reply
No intent to explain to IP addresses. Snowybeagle (talk) 20:27, 15 July 2010 (UTC)Reply
Well then perhaps you'll explain to me. I'm an unrelated editor who found this edit war via WP:AIV. Please explain why this article is notable, and do not discriminate against IP contributors. elektrikSHOOS 07:26, 16 July 2010 (UTC)Reply
Put in my reasons in AfD talkpage.Snowybeagle (talk) 15:27, 16 July 2010 (UTC)Reply