This article is part of WikiProject Theatre, a WikiProject dedicated to coverage of theatre on Wikipedia. To participate: Feel free to edit the article attached to this page, join up at the project page, or contribute to the project discussion.TheatreWikipedia:WikiProject TheatreTemplate:WikiProject TheatreTheatre articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Elizabethan theatre, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Elizabethan theatreWikipedia:WikiProject Elizabethan theatreTemplate:WikiProject Elizabethan theatreElizabethan theatre articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Shakespeare, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of William Shakespeare on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ShakespeareWikipedia:WikiProject ShakespeareTemplate:WikiProject ShakespeareShakespeare articles
Latest comment: 17 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
John Downes' statement about Lowin and Shakespeare is clearly appropriate for a work of reference, since it appears in a number of such reference works, including the one used here as a source, Halliday's Shakespeare Companion. As long as it's presented as what it is — a report from a specific source, not a fact, but not a subjective POV statement either — it's acceptable. Much of the material we possess on Shakespeare and his contemporaries, as well as historical figures of previous eras, consists of such reported information. If we deleted all such material, we'd have little left. Ugajin 18:56, 21 November 2006 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 16 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
Shouldn't we have something about the plot ? -- Beardo (talk) 03:28, 11 February 2008 (UTC)Reply
I second this. I was just going to ask the same question when I saw this comment. If not a detailed plot summary, at least a general statement of what period of Henry's life this covers. DavidRF (talk) 04:38, 15 February 2008 (UTC)Reply
