Talk:Henry I, Count of Schwerin

Latest comment: 15 days ago by 2600:1702:DA0:5440:8D10:820C:65BD:FFE1 in topic Dynasty name

Dynasty name

edit

According to all reliable German accounts of royal genealogy, such as Stammtafeln zur Geschichte der Europäischen Staaten (1965) by Isenburg & Freytag von Loringhoven and Stammtafeln Europäischen Herrscherhäuser (1993) by Sokop the name of this dynasty was Hagen or von Hagen. I have now corrected all the articles which had House of Schwerin. --SergeWoodzing (talk) 16:01, 30 January 2015 (UTC)Reply

At the bottom of the page it still shows House Schwerin for Henry 1, versus it correctly should be House Hagen, as Henry 1 is shown per above and other documents as of House Hagen. 2600:1702:DA0:5440:8D10:820C:65BD:FFE1 (talk) 22:57, 19 July 2024 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Henry I, Count of Schwerin. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:48, 1 April 2017 (UTC)Reply