Talk:Henry Golding

Latest comment: 5 years ago by BD2412 in topic Requested move 18 February 2019

Requested move 18 February 2019 edit

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Moved as proposed. bd2412 T 20:46, 24 February 2019 (UTC)Reply

– The only other two "Henry Golding"s are English parliament members from the 1500s. Both are incredibly tiny stubs with 2 sentences on each page, and share the same source, that being http://www.historyofparliamentonline.org/. Golding's (the actor) pageviews are significantly higher than both the other two's pageviews combined, to the point where the parliament members' are not visible. Google searches for "Henry Golding" only turn up the actor, even when "parliament" is specified. This seems like a clear case of WP:PRIMARYTOPIC to me. DanielleTH (Say hi!) 00:34, 18 February 2019 (UTC)Reply

  • Support. Last year, the Henry Golding DAB page got 11,260 views. The two MPs got a combined 449. There was a day last year when the DAB page got over 1000 views! Obviously this is a poor setup that isn't serving readers. Nohomersryan (talk) 04:04, 18 February 2019 (UTC)Reply
  • Support. The other pages are clearly much less popular or useful to readers than this one. Hickland (talk) 04:44, 18 February 2019 (UTC)Reply
  • Support rare case where there actually is a primary topic in entertainment. In ictu oculi (talk) 08:09, 18 February 2019 (UTC)Reply
  • Support per above. The dab page gets 20x the views of both parliamentarians combined so it's fairly clear that people are mostly looking for the actor. PC78 (talk) 10:34, 18 February 2019 (UTC)Reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.