Talk:Henry Farrell (political scientist)

Untitled

This got speedied; I restored it. As the article sez: Farrell is notable for... so at the very least it *does* assert his importance. William M. Connolley 20:35, 18 January 2006 (UTC).

Noted faculty member?

What is the criteria one is using to determine that he is a "noted" faculty member? Teller . . . Gamow . . . Farrell? Sorry, this does not compute. I have nothing personal against the individual -- it's just that he might be embarrassed to be placed on such a list.

To be a noted political scientist, I'd expect expect *at least* a book. Probably more. Awards -- prestigious fellowships -- and so on. Right now, there are more noted political scientists currently at George Washington University who are not on the list. Give the guy a break -- take him off the list of noted GWU faculty members. --Mchale 01:52, 22 May 2006 (UTC)

I think he is well known rather than noted, if that makes sense, because he writes for the Crooked Timber blog. There are a lot of news articles about him and the blog. Awiseman 16:50, 22 May 2006 (UTC)

Let me put this in terms that we all should be able to understand. There should be some rough criteria so that we can put some people on a list while excluding others. Criteria have to be flexible, of course, as not all disciplines evaluate prestige in the same way, and criteria are changing.

That being said, are there individuals in the Elliott School not listed on this page who are notable in their fields? Well, yes. If we used the criteria apparently used here, I'd assume that MOST of the faculty members at ESIA would end up on this list of prominent faculty members. That would defeat the purpose of the list, would it not? (Irrational Man) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 116.118.21.3 (talk) 05:32, 3 January 2008 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Henry Farrell political scientist.jpg

Image:Henry Farrell political scientist.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 03:53, 7 November 2007 (UTC)

External links modified (January 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Henry Farrell (political scientist). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060314171519/http://www.csmonitor.com/2005/1031/dailyUpdate.html to http://www.csmonitor.com/2005/1031/dailyUpdate.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060505220627/http://beltwayblogroll.nationaljournal.com/archives/2006/01/the_rise_of_blo.php to http://beltwayblogroll.nationaljournal.com/archives/2006/01/the_rise_of_blo.php

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:52, 20 January 2018 (UTC)

Delete article

This person does not appear to meet any of the current notability standards for Academics and the page simply lists some of the things he has published. Superb Owl (talk) 17:09, 30 April 2024 (UTC)