Talk:Henley-in-Arden

Structure of the article

This article reads like it's been cut straight from the Henley-in-Arden tourist website! Maybe it has been...but whatever, the tone of the article is completely inappropriate for Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not an advertising space, it is an encyclopaedia, providing balanced and impartial facts about subject matter. This article ain't it. Murderouspigeon 20:31, 13 March 2007 (UTC)

I've re-written the article from scratch, I hope It's an improvement. G-Man * 22:27, 16 March 2007 (UTC)

User:G-Man's work was a great improvement. However, after the problems with continual reversions into a non-encyclopedic entry and back, the new material added is interesting, but much more attention needs again to be given to making the article's structure conform more to the guidelines of Wikipedia:WikiProject UK geography/How to write about settlements.  DDStretch  (talk) 09:21, 29 April 2007 (UTC)

Asylums

I've moved the section called, at the moment "Lunatic Asylums" into the "History" section as a sub-section. That way, the article becomes more compliant with the guidelines Wikipedia:WikiProject UK geography/How to write about settlements. Additionally, I think calling the sub-section by an archaic colloquialism is not good practice, as it would be misunderstood by people.  DDStretch  (talk) 10:19, 30 April 2007 (UTC)

• I agree about the name (I've already renamed it from "Madhouses") but can't think of a better alternative. "Asylums", perhaps? Andy Mabbett 10:51, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
  • You can always try the name that the cited books use: madhouse. Jonathan de Boyne Pollard 16:41, 16 May 2007 (UTC)
  • After all, Henley-in-Arden was once the madhouse capital of Warwickshire. Jonathan de Boyne Pollard 16:56, 16 May 2007 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Henley-in-Arden. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20050311050212/http://www.statistics.gov.uk/statbase/ssdataset.asp?vlnk=8271&More=Y to http://www.statistics.gov.uk/statbase/ssdataset.asp?vlnk=8271&More=Y

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:15, 31 March 2017 (UTC)