Talk:Hemolymph

Untitled

Hemolymph only exists in organisms with an open circulatory system, so since both articles are so short, I suggest we merge the two. Dave (talk) 23:03, 3 January 2006 (UTC)

I agree. It will make the information easier to access. TheLimbicOne 23:12, 3 January 2006 (UTC)

Unless we have tons of info to add, we could merge both articles into circulatory system (which already has a section on open circulatory systems).

Experts needed

Contrary to the comments above, hemolymph should NOT be part of circulatory system, and should have its own article--even if it is short. Experts on the subject are needed, however. Chiss Boy 23:13, 15 March 2007 (UTC)

Colossal squid hemolymph?

One of the scientists involved with the dissection of the colossal squid specimen in New Zealand referred to hemolymph as "the squid’s blue, copper-based ‘blood’". Can a knowledgeable editor double check that squids do in fact have hemolymph, and if so, can the article be amended to include more than just insects? I don't know the first thing about biological systems. Also, the chemistry of hemolymph (if in fact copper-based) should be discussed. --BlueCanoe (talk) 00:17, 2 May 2008 (UTC)

B-Class criteria checklist

The following checklist is posted with the intent of determining whether this article meets the six B-Class criteria:

References

Is the article is suitably referenced, with inline citations? Does it have has reliable sources, and any important or controversial material which is likely to be challenged?

Scope

Does the article reasonably cover the topic, and does not contain obvious omissions or inaccuracies? Does it contain a large proportion of the material necessary for an A-Class article, although some sections may need expansion, and some less important topics may be missing?

Layout and organization

Does the article has a defined structure? Is the content organized into groups of related material, including a lead section and all the sections that can reasonably be included in an article of its kind?

Well written

Is the article reasonably well-written? Does the prose contain no major grammatical errors and flows sensibly?

Supporting materials

Does the article contain supporting materials where appropriate? Illustrations? Diagrams? Infobox?

Understandable

Does the article present its content in an appropriately understandable way? Is it is written with as broad an audience in mind as possible? Does the article incorrectly assume unnecessary technical background OR are technical terms explained or avoided where possible.

Input anyone?

  Bfpage |leave a message  02:29, 28 January 2015 (UTC)