Untitled edit

Peer Review After looking over your initial draft and outline it seems that your article has a very clear purpose and structure which is great! You make a clear justification for why you believe this page should be created. That being said I do think that the article can be further simplified to either explain in more detail some of the scientific and medical terminology that is used, or you can also link the wikipedia pages for the respective terms so that readers can find out information if they do not have a previous understanding.Rachelleliu (talk) 03:28, 2 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment edit

  This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Aswett2, Sapphire l. Peer reviewers: Rachelleliu.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 22:17, 17 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

Peer review 2 edit

I think the addition of this article to wikipedia would definitely be beneficial. The structure and organization of the categories is good but I think some work needs to be done within each category. One thing that needs to be explained more is what an alpha chain actually is (for example what it is made up of). Its importance is discussed well I just think adding that extra info would make the article more conclusive as a whole. I think the other important thing that needs to be done is linking certain terms to existing article. The previous peer review mentioned this and I also believe it would make your article a lot stronger. Overall, the tone of the article is very encyclopedic and written well. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cmglaser47 (talkcontribs) 20:52, 9 April 2017 (UTC)Reply