Talk:Hell–Sunnan Line/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Fredddie (talk · contribs) 02:35, 12 March 2012 (UTC)

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

   I'm at a loss as to what is the purpose of the right column of numbers in {{Hell–Sunnan Line}}.

   That is the elevation. I've added a legend entry to help guide the reader.

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

   Is the Norwegian Railway Club a WP:RS? I haven't read anything to lead me to believe it's not. Also, one links to Norsk Jernbaneklubb, which redirects, but shouldn't they be similar?

   Fixed so it is consistent. Not everything on NJK's website is reliable, but that particular database is, along with their published books and quarterly magazine. The station database has been made by the club's research division, is largely based on Thor Bjerke's Banedata (he is a museum curator) and is edited by Svein Sando, who has written many railway history books. Arsenikk ^(talk) 11:11, 12 March 2012 (UTC)

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

   Nice work. I'm going to place it on hold for long enough to get an explanation if the railway club is a RS. –Fredddie™ 03:42, 12 March 2012 (UTC)

   Thanks for the review. Both questions have been answered. Arsenikk ^(talk) 11:11, 12 March 2012 (UTC)

   Thank you. I will promote to GA. –Fredddie™ 11:55, 12 March 2012 (UTC)