Talk:Helicopter banner

This page was proposed for deletion by an editor in the past.

This article was nominated for deletion on 30 April 2016. The result of the discussion was redirect to Aerial advertising#Helicopter Banners.

Aviation: Rotorcraft

	Aviation portal This redirect is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles
	This redirect is supported by the rotorcraft project.

Marketing & Advertising Mid‑importance

	This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Marketing & Advertising, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Marketing on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Marketing & AdvertisingWikipedia:WikiProject Marketing & AdvertisingTemplate:WikiProject Marketing & AdvertisingMarketing & Advertising articles
Mid	This redirect has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale.

a

Advertisement edit

Latest comment: 16 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

This article reads like an advertisement for the "HOBS helicopter banner towing system" to me, so much so, that it makes me wonder that if that aspect of the article were removed entirely, there would be anything left at all. What irritates me somewhat, is that the article appears to me to be conflating the concepts of utilizing helicopters as a tow aircraft for aerial advertsing in general, and the HOBS towing system, it can easily be read as if the two are one and the same in this article, which of course they are not. In my opinion, if this article is to be saved, it'll have to be seriously cut back and the "HOBS system" aspect should be properly contextualized, in the form of a simple mention along with other aircraft advertisement towing systems, rather than appear like it's the subject of the article itself. Thoughts?

Deconstructhis 05:59, 15 August 2007 (UTC)Reply

I came to the talk page because I was surprised that text that is so obviously written by someone with an interest in HOBS should appear on Wikipedia. So this entry is simply to say 'I agree with Deconstructhis'. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.35.39.26 (talk) 12:14, 12 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

The Diagrams edit

Latest comment: 16 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion

I have to admit that I'm still a little dubious about the two "diagrams", in terms of whether or not they constitute advertising. Despite the fact they're claimed to be in the public domain, they both contain what appears to me to be the HOBS logo on their lower right corner. If that was the Coca-Cola logo and the topic of a given diagram was an explanation of a generic aspect of the soft drink bottling industry, I doubt it would be allowed. Deconstructhis 13:35, 9 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

Personally, as I mentioned above, I think a much stronger argument can be made for the removal of the two "technical" diagrams, both obviously contain the corporate logo of the HOBS corporation and despite claims that they were "created" by an individual editor, I don't see any waiver for their use by HOBS. In my mind that is a violation of copyright. Deconstructhis 00:24, 16 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

Add topic