This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
Helen Palmer (publisher) is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Socialism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of socialism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SocialismWikipedia:WikiProject SocialismTemplate:WikiProject Socialismsocialism articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women's history and related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women's HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject Women's HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Women's HistoryWomen's History articles
Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Previously speedily deleted articles are also ineligible for this criterion, although they may be deleteable under other criteria.
Article now defeats A7 speedy criteria which its initial speedy delete was conducted under, as it explicitly addresses biographic significance now.
<quote>G7:... This excludes articles that are not substantially identical to the deleted version, articles that address the reasons for which the material was deleted,</quote>
A7 criteria was listed in the initial speedy. This is not substantially identical to the one line stub I wrote which was A7'd.
<quote>A7:...that does not indicate why its subject is important or significant. ... The criterion does not apply to any article that makes any credible claim of significance or importance even if the claim is not supported by a reliable source. The criterion does apply if the claim of significance or importance given is not credible. </quote>
There is a claim of significance and importance made.
The claim is supported by Bob Gould in a published polemic. Historians of the Australian left will be well aware of Gould's capacity to speak here.
Palmer's credible importance is also established by having Freeny write an Australian Dictionary of National biography article regarding Palmer.
.svg){kind=logo}
