Talk:Hedvig Elisabeth Charlotte of Holstein-Gottorp

Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Untitled

edit

Someone should insert two pictures to this article; one of her as a queen, of course, but also one of her as a duchess.

Hello,
I added one of them, but, in my opinion, the other is of low quality. There should be a better one around.
/ Mats Halldin (talk) 20:18, 28 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

That is a very good picture, thank you for inserting it. Indeed, it is almost more important with a picture of her as a Duchess, as that was the period of her life when she had the largest importance.

YIKES!

edit

Can someone who speaks English and is interested in this subject do a re-write, please? The grammar and syntax are HORRIBLE!! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.69.81.2 (talk) 17:16, 17 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

Picture

edit

I have a very old chocolate mug with the picture of a lady who resenbles Hedvig Elisabeth. I don't know if it is her or not but the legend is that it is a family heirloom and came over on the boat with my family members from Sweden in the mid-1800's. There is no marking on the mug but the lady resembles the Roslin picture; however, she is wearing clothing like Marie Antoinette wore in her rustic period. Does anyone out there have anything similar or any thoughts? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Nfkingston (talkcontribs) 20:07, 11 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

Interesting indeed! Please e-mail me a photo of it! SergeWoodzing (talk) 23:23, 11 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

Duchess of Oldenburg

edit

Was she ever Duchess of Oldenburg? Her father became sovereign Duke of Oldenburg in 1774.--Queen Elizabeth II's Little Spy (talk) 19:17, 17 August 2010 (UTC)Reply

Not to my knowledge. Her position as Princess of Sweden and Duchess of Sudermania as of that same year may have made the question moot. SergeWoodzing (talk) 20:25, 17 August 2010 (UTC)Reply

Hedvig Elisabeth Charlottas Dagbok - non-ISBN id identified?

edit

Hedvig Elisabeth Charlottas Dagbok is used as a reference on about 55 pages. Until recently, most of these pages had ISBN errors due to use of unknown non-ISBN IDs in the ISBN. The ISBN errors have now been fixed by various editors, either by moving the unknown IDs to the ID field or by deleting the ID. I recently noticed that the unknown ID numbers appear as part of the signature marks. I posted some more information about this in a central location (Help talk:Citation Style 1/Archive 5#Hedvig Elisabeth Charlottas Dagbok - non-ISBN id identified?) in case this affects any opinions about whether these numbers should be retained and/or how they should be documented. I'm posting similar messages to this one on the talk pages of a few other higher-traffic articles that use this reference to give any watchers a chance to participate in any discussion there. I will be watching the central page but not this one. TuxLibNit (talk) 20:32, 23 May 2014 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Hedvig Elisabeth Charlotte of Holstein-Gottorp. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:00, 1 November 2017 (UTC)Reply