Talk:Hedonic hunger/GA1
GA Review
editGA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Gug01 (talk · contribs)
Obvious/major mistakes/errors
editThere are no large mistakes/errors. There are no {{POW}} or {{unreferenced}} tags, etc.
References
editThere is a sufficient number of references and they are reliable sources.
Spelling, grammar, punctuation and capitalization
editThis article is well-written and does not contain any spelling, grammar, punctuation or capitalization issues.
Article content: plagiarism, content/comprehensiveness and image use policies
editThere is no plagiarism and the images are correctly licensed. The content broadly covers the subject but doesn't go into great detail except where needed.
Stability and point of view
editThis article is very stable, with no edit wars in all of its history, and is written from a neutral point of view. Gug01 (talk) 21:22, 1 January 2015 (UTC) Gug 01
Overview in all
editThis article is stable, well-referenced, and in general perfect to be a good article. The lead is very short and summarizing, and the article is informative, accessible, of a reasonable length and understandable to everybody. Gug01 (talk) 21:22, 1 January 2015 (UTC) Gug 01