Talk:Heart of the Universe

The "Omnipotence Arms Race" continues unabated

Ouch. When was this added to the storyline, anyway? I thought they would have stopped the "escalation of omnipotence" with the Living Tribunal, but I guess at least one writer thinks there's still room at the top! --Grey Knight 23:49, 22 October 2006 (UTC)

So Jim Starlin's a wanker. What else is new?

Should this page be deleted?

Given that this object is officially not a part of Marvel's continuity in any way or form, should this page be removed from Wikipedia? David A (talk) 10:24, 18 January 2015 (UTC)

That's not a reason to delete, but you could consider a merge to Marvel: The End. 2601:D:B482:DD00:FDF3:4F44:633C:7675 (talk) 18:03, 18 January 2015 (UTC)

A merge would be appropriate regardless of continuity. It's a minor artifact. I would like to point out that despite Brevoort's comment, the events of "MU:TE" have been referenced in the mainstream contiuity. Did he have an explanation for his comment, and did he also mean to imply the first six issues of Thano's title were also not in continuity? Argento Surfer (talk) 16:11, 20 January 2015 (UTC)

He stated that all "The End" series were outside of continuity per definition as Marvel the company's official stance, and that the event of making death immutable again did not affect Marvel's regular policy on the issue. I suppose that Thanos musing would either become megalomaniacal psychotic delusions or simply did not happen, whereas the rest of the Thanos series did. Jim Starlin presumably tried to circumwent his explicit instructions, but Marvel's editorial would have none of it. David A (talk) 18:18, 20 January 2015 (UTC)

OAA

It's stated that the HOU was an entity, isn't it? If it was inside the Marvel continuity (which it isn't) it would likely be the OAA. Either way, is 'artifact' an accurate description considering the sentience? --Stevehim (talk) 15:24, 29 March 2015 (UTC)

Proposed merge

Per my earlier comment above, I support the merge. Argento Surfer (talk) 19:20, 19 May 2015 (UTC)

I also support the proposed merger. David A (talk) 11:25, 20 May 2015 (UTC)

As the person who proposed the merge I obviously support it, but please post all future comments (for or against) on the official merge proposal discussion. (It's Wikipedia policy to have the merge discussion on the talk page of the article the merge is going into.) Thank you! Spidey104 15:19, 22 May 2015 (UTC)