Talk:Hearing test

Deaf Top‑importance

	This article is part of WikiProject Deaf, the WikiProject which seeks to improve articles relating to all aspects of deaf-related and Deaf culture. For the Project guidelines, see the project page or talk page.DeafWikipedia:WikiProject DeafTemplate:WikiProject Deafdeaf articles
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.

Medicine Low‑importance

	Medicine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Ideal sources for Wikipedia's health content are defined in the guideline Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources (medicine) and are typically review articles. Here are links to possibly useful sources of information about Hearing test.

PubMed provides review articles from the past five years (limit to free review articles)
The TRIP database provides clinical publications about evidence-based medicine.
Other potential sources include: Centre for Reviews and Dissemination and CDC

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 16 January 2019 and 1 May 2019. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Herrmaac.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 23:14, 16 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

Speech In Noise Testing

Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The information provided on speech in noise testing is very limited to a description on hearing in noise. It is a very valuable portion of the test battery as it represents a key complaint found in hearing aid users - this being the issue of being unable to hear speech in noise. ^[1] It would be good to mention how well these types of tests evaluate the two component characteristics of hearing loss: the loss of acuity and the loss in the ability to clarify speech. ^[2]

The information also only encompasses a description of one type of speech in noise test. In fact, there has been new test developed to be more efficient, such as the QuickSIN. ^[3] A brief overview of the more popular tests would be a good idea to include in a description page such as this.

Ellyn Kuehne (talk) 22:22, 2 September 2016 (UTC)Reply

References

^ Duncan, K.R.; Aarts, N.L. (2006). "A Comparison of the HINT and QuickSIN Tests". Journal of Speech-Language Pathology and Audiology. 30 (2): 86-94.
^ Wilson, R.H.; McArdle, R (2005). "Speech signals used to evaluate functional status of the auditory system". The Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development. 42 (4s): 79. doi:10.1682/jrrd.2005.06.0096.
^ Wilson, R.H.; McArdle, R.A.; Smith, S.L (2007). "An Evaluation of the BKB-SIN, HINT, QuickSIN, and WIN materials on listeners with normal hearing and listeners with hearing loss". Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research. 50 (4): 844. doi:10.1044/1092-4388(2007/059).

References

Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

This article has quite a bit of content, however there seems to be a lack of source citations. There are only two articles that have been referenced for this page, but there is a lot of factual information in the content of each section. To provide more accurate and current information, there should be more references to appropriate and reliable sources. This will help to improve the article on hearing tests. I think a good goal to improve this article would be to focus on adding to the content by providing references for factual information. Sara.hartson (talk) 19:31, 14 September 2018 (UTC)Reply

Tests that need to be included

Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Information needs to be added regarding tests that are routine part of clinical assessment of hearing and speech understanding. My suggestions include:

Information about masking
Speech audiometry to include tests of auditory threshold determination
speech discrimination testing.
Tests for dynamic range of hearing from threshold to comfortable loudness to discomfort and pain.
Reference tests for auditory processing disorders and (send the reader to that Wiki page)
Use of speech audiometry for site of lesion: e.g. middle ear disease, cochlear hearing loss, retrocochlear hearing loss, etc
speech testing in quiet and in noise, at different S/N levels, and why
electrophysiologic testing
otoacoustic emissions
acoustic reflex thresholds and reflex decay
Tests for auditory recruitment
Tests for auditory fatigue

UIowagrad (talk) 17:12, 11 January 2019 (UTC)Reply

Add topic

[1] Duncan, K.R.; Aarts, N.L. (2006). "A Comparison of the HINT and QuickSIN Tests". Journal of Speech-Language Pathology and Audiology. 30 (2): 86-94.

[2] Wilson, R.H.; McArdle, R (2005). "Speech signals used to evaluate functional status of the auditory system". The Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development. 42 (4s): 79. doi:10.1682/jrrd.2005.06.0096.

[3] Wilson, R.H.; McArdle, R.A.; Smith, S.L (2007). "An Evaluation of the BKB-SIN, HINT, QuickSIN, and WIN materials on listeners with normal hearing and listeners with hearing loss". Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research. 50 (4): 844. doi:10.1044/1092-4388(2007/059).

[1]

[2]

[3]