Talk:Hearing conservation program
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment
editThis article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Jennifer.ruths. Peer reviewers: Rans1717.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 22:15, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment
editThis article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Amk1251908.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 22:15, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment
editThis article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 27 August 2018 and 7 December 2018. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Ashleykwebb.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 22:15, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment
editThis article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 25 August 2020 and 11 December 2020. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): HunterVegas.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 22:15, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
Hearing Conservation Program for Kids
editHello! I would like to edit this article by adding some information about hearing loss prevention programs for children. It would be nice for parents to be able to read a section on the prevention of hearing loss for their kids in an educational or community-based setting. The following are evidence-based sources regarding teaching hearing conservation in the educational realm.
Griest, S. E., Folmer, R. L., & Martin, W. H. (2007). Effectiveness of “Dangerous Decibels,” a school-based hearing loss prevention program. American Journal of Audiology, 16(2). doi:10.1044/1059-0889(2007/021)
Gallihugh, N. (2007). Implementation of a hearing loss prevention program in a school setting. Perspectives on Hearing Conservation and Occupational Audiology, 11(1), 4. doi:10.1044/hcoa11.1.4
Folmer, R. (2008). Hearing-loss prevention practices should Be taught in schools. Seminars in Hearing, 29(1), 067-080. doi:10.1055/s-2007-1021774
Folmer, R. L., Griest, S. E., & Martin, W. H. (2002). Hearing conservation education programs for children: A review. Journal of School Health, 72(2), 51-57. doi:10.1111/j.1746-1561.2002.tb06514.x
Martin, W. H., Sobel, J., Griest, S. E., Howarth, L., & Yongbing, S. (2006). Noise induced hearing loss in children: Preventing the silent epidemic. Journal of Otology, 1(1), 11-21. doi:10.1016/s1672-2930(06)50002-9
Jennifer.ruths (talk) 17:48, 29 September 2016 (UTC)
- Jennifer.ruths, feel free to make contributions as you see fit! Let me know if there is any way I can be of assistance. James Hare (NIOSH) (talk) 14:36, 3 October 2016 (UTC)
Hearing Protection Devices
editThe first sentence of this section "If engineering controls fail to maintain an 8-hour time-weighted average below 85 dBA, then a hearing protection device (HPD) is required" needs a citation. Mbruce13 (talk) 19:15, 2 February 2018 (UTC)
Earplugs
editHello. Is there a source that can be cited to show where the information regarding the four general classes of earplugs was found? Amariemurphy (talk) 22:56, 14 January 2018 (UTC)
This section on earplugs is a good opportunity for a visual showing various types of HPD. Consider adding pictures here. GTachenko (talk) 19:14, 2 February 2018 (UTC)
Suggestion
editI would consider re-wording certain statements within the article that introduce opinion so that it only includes factual information. For example, “Audiometric testing is most important...” ; and “The NRR now has some help.” Amariemurphy (talk) 00:12, 15 January 2018 (UTC)
In the section "Audiometric testing program" reference 14 is used for 7 of the 8 citations. I would consider searching for another source of information. NewlandStage5 (talk) 19:18, 2 February 2018 (UTC)
The sentence in the "Audiometric testing program" that reads "Audiometric testing is a very important part of a hearing conservation program" may introduce some bias towards the audiometric testing being the most important part of the program. Consider revising to make a more neutral statement. Sisjenni (talk) 19:21, 2 February 2018 (UTC)
I would like to fix some of the grammatical errors, provide a few citations, and rewrite the Noise Reduction Rating section. The graphic used in that section is taken directly from an article and I believe it is plagiarized.MBooth7 (talk) 17:25, 22 March 2019 (UTC)
Critique of Employee training and education section
editI would consider removing or editing the last sentence in the Employee training and education, "Proper training is imperative since "even with a very modest amount of instruction attenuation performance can be significantly improved."" When adding to wikipedia articles, including quotations is not recommended.
Additionally, it may be beneficial to add a section about resources needed to implement hearing conservation training. Tessa Mannlein (talk) 19:28, 2 February 2018 (UTC)
Employee training and education
editI would consider changing the wording of the sentence "Providing a refresher training when appropriate will ensure retention of this information as well" by exchanging out the word "ensure" with "support". Using "ensure" introduces a bias claim. (Chad.bailey (talk) 19:35, 2 February 2018 (UTC))
Equipment and Administrative Controls
editThe equipment and administrative controls section appeared to be written persuasively rather than in a non-biased manner. The section alluded to the hierarchy of noise control, but did not go into how engineering and administrative controls fell within that hierarchy. Klafreniere (talk) 20:31, 7 February 2018 (UTC)
Sound Survey
editWithin this section of the article, I would like to add that if a noise screening results in thresholds greater than 80 dBA, then noise sampling will need to occur. Tculbertson2 (talk) 16:59, 9 February 2018 (UTC)