Talk:Headset (bicycle part)
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors |
The wrong Chris King is being linked.
editAs far as I know, he was a mountain biker, not a basketball player.
BMX frames
editThis question, posted by User:24.255.106.219, removed from article: "edit 2-15-2008 --> now many bmx frame use this standard as well. its lighter and has a lower parts count."
Maintenance manual
editThis reads like a maintenance manual. I thought that wasn't Wikipedia's intention, useful though it is.Les woodland (talk) 20:40, 9 February 2010 (UTC)les woodland
Integrated Headset section lacks balance
editIntegrated headsets are used widely, there is no data presented to support the proposition that they are a cost cutting measure by manufacturers, or that frame wear is a problem. It just reads like a personal vendetta against a particular technology. King may be experienced and comfortable with traditional bearing assemblies, but it is not clear he is an authority on manufacturing or engineering, or bearing technology.
Integrated bearings use sealed bearing units of very high quality, they are extremely smooth and reliable to use. If the bearing fails or wears, the bearing unit comprising both cup and cone, can be replaced in one unit. The method of tensioning the stack ensures correct tensioning every time and is very easy to to. If the stack is tensioned correctly, the failure modes contemplated by King are difficult to realise.
Suggest a more balanced approach, validated by references to persons other than King. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Beaglebent (talk • contribs) 01:39, 22 May 2011 (UTC)
What happened to the Cane Creek/Dia-Compe page?
editThe inventor of the threadless headset had a page of their own but now there are only red links? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 184.57.3.114 (talk) 17:30, 16 January 2013 (UTC)
Threaded steerer - threading height limitation
editThe article says "Threaded forks necessitate that the threads on the steerer only use the top 1–2 inches," but doesn't say why. I went looking and found this information
"For safety, it is important that the stem wedge end up below the threaded portion of the fork column, so that the fulcrum and stress is not in the weak threaded portion of the fork column."
in this PDF: ftp://ftp.ico.aha.ru/velo/6.pdf
This is my first activity on Wikipedia so I wasn't sure whether this was enough to go ahead and edit the article.
Threaded internal?
editThe article seems to state that only threadless headsets can be internal.
I have a bike with a clearly threaded headset, with a quill stem inserted into it. However, the bearings are inside the frame.
There is nothing between the fork crown and the head tube other than a thin plastic ring. No race is visible.
On top, there is a nut, with a plastic cover. No cup or race are visible either.
The head tube is clearly widened on top and bottom to accommodate the internal bearings.
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Headset (bicycle part). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110726012043/http://www.bonthronebikes.co.uk/help/headsets to http://www.bonthronebikes.co.uk/help/headsets
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100923120802/http://chrisking.com/files/pdfs/Int20HeadsetsExplained.pdf to http://chrisking.com/files/pdfs/Int20HeadsetsExplained.pdf
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100513003312/http://canecreek.com/tech-headsets?view=standards to http://www.canecreek.com/tech-headsets?view=standards
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:43, 31 October 2017 (UTC)
Types > Threaded
editAn ISO Standard thread of 1" in diameter with 24 TPI is mentioned. Which standard is this exactly? It's definitely not ISO metric standard, nor BSP. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Severoraz (talk • contribs) 19:38, 15 July 2018 (UTC)
Could someone make clear which is/are the stem bolt(s)?
editCould someone make clear which is/are the stem bolt(s)? I have been looking (like many Star Trek: Deep Space 9 fans before me) to find out what a stem bolt actually is (even if there is no such thing as a "self-sealing stem bolt" as referred to in Season 1 Episode 15 "Progress"). This is the first genuine, actual (as opposed to fictional) stem bolt I've found, and I still can't pick it out from the rest of the complicated assembly. 2604:2000:F64D:FC00:FD1B:77A7:731D:57EC (talk) 01:53, 21 January 2020 (UTC)
The part that says 'bolt' in the exploded views - Also says 'cap bolt' https://i.ebayimg.com/images/i/222323739835-0-1/s-l1000.jpg 2.98.53.149 (talk) 13:07, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
Integrated head tube section problems
editThis section needs clarification and grammar fixes. For example, use of in/into, via, why fewer tools are needed, why tools are needed at all for an integrated tube. >Integrated head tubes (with chamfers) Bike frames with integrated headsets have cups machined directly in the frame, and the bearing sits directly into the frame instead of via separately installed cups. Fewer tools needed compared to traditional bearing cups which need to be pressed into the frame using special tools (or a hammer and wood block). Habronattus (talk) 11:00, 13 August 2023 (UTC)