Talk:Hazel R. O'Leary/GA1
Latest comment: 5 years ago by Barkeep49 in topic GA Review
GA Review edit
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Barkeep49 (talk · contribs) 15:12, 13 June 2018 (UTC)
Criteria edit
- It is reasonably well written.
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):
- a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- Pass/Fail:
Review edit
Lead edit
- A sentence each covering what she did at Fiske and controversy as Energy Secretary probably belong as part of MOS:LEADREL.
Early life and education edit
- Merely a suggestion but sourcing exists that O'Leary had a "privileged" childhood which seems worthy of inclusion.
Career edit
- At what level of government was O'Leary an "assistant attorney general" (the particular page cited doesn't show for me on Google Books)?
- Need a source in the same sentence as the Press Secretary (who should probably be named and wikilinked in addition to the title) quote about the "unacceptable" project.
- There should either be a 2011 comparison of the Fiske numbers form 2008 or the numbers should be removed in 2008.
- Finding old numbers for Fisk is challenging. I think given how much attention she received for the sale of art work, it is important to try and show other aspects of her tenure. My preference is to leave it the numbers to 2008, which provide a sense of the size of the institution she oversaw, and to leave the statement that enrollment improved. Both are sourced. I am open to hearing more about your thoughts. Knope7 (talk) 01:47, 1 July 2018 (UTC)
Personal Life edit
- No sourcing for her second husband
- This section repeats information found elsewhere and is perhaps unnecessary. Alternatively the information found elsewhere should be removed so it's only in this section.
- Her first husband is mentioned in the article because he affected her career. The third is mentioned because it explains her name and he also played a role in her career. I don't think it's unusual to mention spouses and children elsewhere if they are relevant and still recap in personal life. Knope7 (talk) 01:55, 1 July 2018 (UTC)
- If this section is kept might flow better next to Early life and education
- Why is her joining a Presbyterian Church worth inclusion?
Images edit
- While the infobox is her official DOE portrait, I would suggest that the image which has the caption that starts "O'Leary speaks on September..." is higher quality and more recent and would deserve the better placement on the page.
Discussion edit
Can Knope7 or other article editor please confirm interest in going through the GA review process? Best, Barkeep49 (talk) 15:12, 13 June 2018 (UTC)
@Knope7: See comments and thoughts above. Best, Barkeep49 (talk) 18:02, 29 June 2018 (UTC)
Sorry Knope7 went on an unexpected Wikibreak for a couple weeks and forgot to circle back to this when I returned. It looks ready to pass. Congratulations. Best, Barkeep49 (talk) 16:28, 23 July 2018 (UTC)