Talk:Haymarket Media Group

Untitled

teddington isn't in london, it's in middlesex. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.192.157.153 (talk) 00:14, 6 September 2008 (UTC)

What? Middlesex hasn't existed for decades. Teddington is in the London [there's the clue] Borough of Richmond Upon Thames. 86.7.211.128 (talk) 01:24, 12 February 2010 (UTC)

Want to correct a couple of dates in this page

Hello, I work for the corporate communications department of Haymarket and just want to make a couple of factual edits in agreement with Wikipedia's conflict of interest policies. I don't think there are external sources for these two date changes, so wondered if anyone could tell me if it's appropriate to change them. The changes are to the paragraph below:

and in 1958 relaunched Man About Town , which was to become an influential (though unprofitable) men’s consumer magazine. The company failed in its relaunch of the British news weekly Topic, the title closing at the end of 1962, within three months of the takeover.[2] The partners split in 1964, with Heseltine renaming his half of the business Haymarket Press to publish Management Today.

Haymarket purchased and relaunched Man About Town in 1959, not 1958. The partners split in 1965, not 1964, that is two years after the company changed its name from Cornmarket Press to Haymarket following Hazel, Watson & Vinney taking a stake in the company (1963).

Could anyone let me know if it is appropriate to make these two date edits?

Also, responding to the previous post on this page, Teddington is in Middlesex but it is also in the borough of Richmond, which is a greater London borough. ThanksTanya Bluestone (talk) 11:42, 23 January 2009 (UTC)

Haymarket Books Chicago

I think there's an omission here - or a new article should be created. Haymarket Books is a self-described "nonprofit, radical book distributor and publisher" based in Chicago and is independent from the Haymarket Media Group. If no one has any objection, I will create a new article for them - they are now one of the most significant radical publishing houses in the U.S., so definitely they meet notability guidelines - and do all the necessary redirects. Bruxism (talk) 07:40, 1 June 2015 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Haymarket Media Group. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20091018055544/http://top100.nma.co.uk/ to http://top100.nma.co.uk/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:45, 31 October 2017 (UTC)