Talk:Hashmonaim
 | Warning: active arbitration remedies The contentious topics procedure applies to this article. This article is related to the Arab–Israeli conflict, which is a contentious topic. Furthermore, the following rules apply when editing this article:
Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page.
|
Peace Now edit
Shuki, the material from Peace Now was already explicitly attributed to Peace Now, so could you explain why you made it so that they claim what they reported? Also, please review this before making these claims that Peace Now is not a reliable source, especially for attributed statements. nableezy - 23:25, 12 December 2011 (UTC)
"Binyamin Region of Israel" edit
Uhh, what? This place is now located in a region of Israel? Since when? nableezy - 06:00, 13 December 2011 (UTC)
- I have corrected the error. nableezy - 13:48, 14 December 2011 (UTC)
- While arguably not a region of Israel, the Mateh Binyamin Regional Council is a unarguably one of the 53 regional councils of the State of Israel. I've edited the article to clarify that this is so. If an editor wishes to change "Israel" to "State of Israel" to stress that the regional council is a construct of the state, as opposed to an objective geographical designation, that's fine too.—Biosketch (talk) 15:21, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
- An issue I see with edits like this is that they are about Israel when the location is actually in the Palestinian territories. It's arguably misleading and superfluous. Or possibly it's informative. I think all of these articles should actually say West Bank, Palestinian territories, to make it clear that these locations are not in Israel at the start of the article, in the infobox or both. Alternatively, something like "under the jurisdiction of the Mateh Binyamin Regional Council of Israel in the Palestinian territories" would also work but seems silly. Either way, I see these 'of Israel' kind of edits as potentially problematic and destabilizing because they could apply to every settlement article in which case a centralized discussion may be better. Sean.hoyland - talk 16:04, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
- Well said. nableezy - 16:06, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
- An issue I see with edits like this is that they are about Israel when the location is actually in the Palestinian territories. It's arguably misleading and superfluous. Or possibly it's informative. I think all of these articles should actually say West Bank, Palestinian territories, to make it clear that these locations are not in Israel at the start of the article, in the infobox or both. Alternatively, something like "under the jurisdiction of the Mateh Binyamin Regional Council of Israel in the Palestinian territories" would also work but seems silly. Either way, I see these 'of Israel' kind of edits as potentially problematic and destabilizing because they could apply to every settlement article in which case a centralized discussion may be better. Sean.hoyland - talk 16:04, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
- While arguably not a region of Israel, the Mateh Binyamin Regional Council is a unarguably one of the 53 regional councils of the State of Israel. I've edited the article to clarify that this is so. If an editor wishes to change "Israel" to "State of Israel" to stress that the regional council is a construct of the state, as opposed to an objective geographical designation, that's fine too.—Biosketch (talk) 15:21, 15 December 2011 (UTC)
External links modified edit
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Hashmonaim. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120425163034/http://www.jposttravel.com/jerusalem_tours/AyalonValley1008.html to http://www.jposttravel.com/jerusalem_tours/AyalonValley1008.html
- Added archive https://archive.is/20120905083119/http://www.jewishtimes.com/index.php/jewishtimes/news/jt/israel_news/israeli_forces_demolish_settlement_homes/ to http://www.jewishtimes.com/index.php/jewishtimes/news/jt/israel_news/israeli_forces_demolish_settlement_homes/
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100706021237/http://www.icj-cij.org/docket/files/131/1671.pdf to http://www.icj-cij.org/docket/files/131/1671.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:46, 31 October 2017 (UTC)