Talk:Harry Bath

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified (January 2018)

500 games in 9 years edit

Not sure if I wrote it or who did, but 500 games for Warrington is an awful lot of games in nine years. That's more that one a week every week of each year. ?!? doesn't sound right ? -Sticks66 13:37, 18 August 2007 (UTC)Reply

but both the Whiticker and Andrews refs cite this.-Sticks66 12:22, 27 February 2008 (UTC)Reply
Maybe a typo? I doubt that it's accurate.--Jeff79 (talk) 12:50, 27 February 2008 (UTC)Reply
I'm going with over 500 goals, not games. There's no mention of 500 games in the 1992 Andrews but it does mention his prowess as a goal-kicker. See here (scroll down to story 1) for a more accurate number of games and a quick add up of goals kicked is def over 500. Florrieleave a note 12:52, 27 February 2008 (UTC)Reply
ETA The bio at the 100 Greatest Player's says 350 games (in England, not just at Warrington). Found an actual ref for total games at Warrington. [1] and according to this it was over 800 goals! Florrieleave a note 13:00, 27 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

So I checked again. 2006 Andrews does not mention a number of games in England; it's the 2006 Whiticker/Hudson Encyc that does the damage in saying "the burly forward shifted to Warrington and over the next nine years played over 500 games for the club"; the Telegraph lift-out re the Top 100 says 350 games in England and the site Florrie has found above says 346 for Warrington plus the Quigley Era of the Biff site has a per season count that adds to 346. So assuming he played at least 5 games for Barrow it sounds like it was 350 in the UK. I think I will just cite the Warrington 346. It's still a phenomenal figure given it took Terry Lamb 17 seasons to clock 349.Sticks66 12:07, 28 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Harry Bath. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:52, 30 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

External links modified (January 2018) edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Harry Bath. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:27, 20 January 2018 (UTC)Reply