Talk:Hardraw Force

Yorkshire Low‑importance

	Yorkshire portal Hardraw Force is within the scope of WikiProject Yorkshire, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Yorkshire on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project, see a list of open tasks, and join in discussions on the project's talk page.YorkshireWikipedia:WikiProject YorkshireTemplate:WikiProject YorkshireYorkshire articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Rivers: Waterfalls Low‑importance

	Geography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Rivers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Rivers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RiversWikipedia:WikiProject RiversTemplate:WikiProject RiversRiver articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Waterfalls task force.

As well as no longer being allowed to go behind the waterfall, is it true you are now no longer allowed to go to the top of the waterfall?

£2 admission! The last time I was there it was four pence (4d) to get in, and the time before that. Stuffed cat (talk) 12:55, 4 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

Yes, I remember paying four old pence, but the current owner has done extensive renovations and has to pay high insurance premiums. Last time I was there I climbed to the top, but this freedom might have changed in the last couple of years. Unfortunately, Health & Safety requirements have run amok in the current climate of litigation. Dbfirs 08:26, 17 November 2009 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Hardraw Force. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080907094800/http://www.darlingtonandstocktontimes.co.uk/display.var.1689878.0.0.php to http://www.darlingtonandstocktontimes.co.uk/display.var.1689878.0.0.php

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:43, 30 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

Add topic