Talk:Hardanger Line/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: S Masters (talk) 10:19, 24 April 2010 (UTC)

GA review (see here for criteria)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS):

   Article is well written and complies to WP:MOS.

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

   All references are in order.

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

   Article is broad in its coverage and remains focused.

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

   Article complies to WP:NPOV.

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

   Article is stable.

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

   All images comply to fair use requirements and are properly captioned.

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

Comments: There were some minor issues, which I have fixed. I am satisfied that the article complies with all the requirements for a Good Article, and I am happy to pass it. -- S Masters (talk) 11:07, 24 April 2010 (UTC)

Thank you for taking the time and effort to review the article. Arsenikk ^(talk) 11:16, 24 April 2010 (UTC)