This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Food and drink, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of food and drink related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Food and drinkWikipedia:WikiProject Food and drinkTemplate:WikiProject Food and drinkFood and drink articles
Delete unrelated trivia sections found in articles. Please review WP:Trivia and WP:Handling trivia to learn how to do this.
Add the {{WikiProject Food and drink}} project banner to food and drink related articles and content to help bring them to the attention of members. For a complete list of banners for WikiProject Food and drink and its child projects, select here.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Veganism and Vegetarianism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of veganism and vegetarianism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Veganism and VegetarianismWikipedia:WikiProject Veganism and VegetarianismTemplate:WikiProject Veganism and VegetarianismVeganism and Vegetarianism articles
With help from the teahouse (thanks again User:Maproom) fixed non-independant sources and promotional fluff G.C.E. Galotta (talk) 11:45, 14 October 2016 (UTC)Reply
DrStrauss: Which parts should have more references, in order to remove the refimprove-flag? G.C.E. Galotta (talk) 12:16, 16 January 2017 (UTC)Reply
@DrStrauss: The statements about the other topics and other available features (like forum etc.) could be confirmed by checking the appropriate page on happycow.net (e.g. the topics can be found here: https://www.happycow.net/vegtopics) but I guess it will be hard to find an independent source for them. Same thing for the number of listings, reviews, etc. (which are published here: https://www.happycow.net/browse). Any advice? G.C.E. Galotta (talk) 14:14, 16 January 2017 (UTC)Reply
@G.C.E. Galotta: two things I would change: "well established" - to keep that you'll probably need some stats on number of posts etc and a source, "Reviews of these listings number over 150,000" - just a simple citation source is needed. DrStrausstalk 16:51, 16 January 2017 (UTC)Reply
@DrStrauss: How about this stats page: https://www.happycow.net/reports/stats for the "Reviews of these listings number over 150,000"? And maybe just remove the "well established" for the blog and forum?
