Talk:Happened-before

Latest comment: 12 years ago by 87.64.106.236 in topic Entire article written by monkeys

Example

edit

I find that the example is useless, and is explained in the article about Lamport timestamps. If there is no objection, I will erase it. Momet (talk) 20:37, 31 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

I've removed it. Momet (talk) 20:24, 5 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

Partial Orders

edit

Partial orders are not irreflexive. If no one objects I will remove "like all partial orders,..." —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.212.207.67 (talk) 17:49, 31 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

Strict partial orders are irreflexive. Happened-before is normally defined as a strict partial order. "Partial order" by itself was ambiguous. David-Sarah Hopwood (talk) 14:41, 3 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

Needs work

edit

This page really needs work. Its pretty difficult to understand this concept from this article, even though the concept is stupidly intuitive. Fresheneesz (talk) 03:40, 27 February 2012 (UTC)Reply

Entire article written by monkeys

edit

"Even if those events are in reality executed out of order (usually to optimize program flow)."

Not a complete sentence. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.64.106.236 (talk) 09:14, 13 October 2012 (UTC)Reply