This article is within the scope of WikiProject Human Genetic History, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Human Genetic HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject Human Genetic HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Human Genetic HistoryHuman Genetic History articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Molecular Biology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Molecular Biology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Molecular BiologyWikipedia:WikiProject Molecular BiologyTemplate:WikiProject Molecular BiologyMolecular Biology articles
Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
I am loath to edit in this area for fear of introducing an error, but while doing a bit of work on Indigenous Australians (which include Aboriginal Australians as well as the (Melanesian) Torres Strait Islander people) for other purposes, wonder if a bit more clarity could be added to this area about someone who knows more about genetics? I think that this study is the source of quite a lot of the info in the Distribution section. Just to be clear on which info (if any) applies to Aboriginal Australians only. In the Materials and methods section of that article, it says "32 sampled Aboriginal Australians from Kalumburu in northwestern Australia and 48 NG highlanders from the Bundi area" - which seems to suggest that the "Indigenous Australians" would probably be better represented by a link to Aboriginal Australians... But I don't know much about genetics and prefer not to wade into this area. Laterthanyouthink (talk) 10:30, 26 December 2019 (UTC)Reply
