Talk:Hap Glaudi

Latest comment: 4 years ago by Otr500 in topic Source issues and assessment

Re: CSD

edit

It is not clear to me why this article could be considered to be a promotion of something. The subject, Hap Glaudi, passed away 21 years ago and has not worked as a broadcast journalist for considerably longer than that. He is a matter of historical interest to the broadcast community, to the sports community, and to those interested in the unique culture of New Orleans. Therefore, it is not a promotion but an illustration of a local celebrity in a unique culture. Perhaps "illustration of a local celebrity in a unique culture" could be somehow construed as a promotion, but this is certainly not the case, especially since the subject is a long-deceased local celebrity. Nothing commercial is at stake in this article, nothing to buy or sell, no promotion of a living individual. The article is simply historical. Nolabob (talk) 11:51, 26 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

Phrases like "A formative period in his early education", "His style resonated well in New Orleans", "Glaudi began to enjoy a national reputation." and finally, "Glaudi appeared in a 1964 episode of CBS-TV's hit show Gunsmoke in a bit part. A common practice at the time was for local celebrities to take bit parts in the parent network's popular television shows both to promote their show and their affiliates." Who says he's a local celebrity? Most of these phrases constitute WP:WEASEL words and the article in general is written and reads like an opinionated biography. —Ancient ApparitionChampagne? • 10:59pm • 11:59, 26 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

Ancient Apparition: I think I get your point now, and I appreciate your perspective. I have addressed the matters that you identified. Please re-review the article. Many thanks. Nolabob (talk) 12:24, 26 March 2011 (UTC) 12:17, 26 March 2011 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nolabob (talkcontribs) Reply

The article reads much better now, thanks Nolabob! —Ancient ApparitionChampagne? • 11:12am • 00:12, 27 March 2011 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Hap Glaudi. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:35, 29 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

Source issues and assessment

edit
This article has far too much unsourced content. It does not pass the B-class criteria (#1) with an unsourced section and certain contentious content like "During his freshman year at Jesuit High he entered the English Writing Contest with a story about an exercise boy at the New Orleans Fairgrounds who discovers a criminal plot. His story won the Gold Medal and the then school president told Hap he wouldn't have to pay tuition in the future.".
I thought I would raise the concerns before tagging and possible demotion. Otr500 (talk) 04:27, 12 February 2020 (UTC)Reply