Talk:Hanyang University

Korea High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Korea, a collaborative effort to build and improve articles related to Korea. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how use this banner, please refer to the documentation.KoreaWikipedia:WikiProject KoreaTemplate:WikiProject KoreaKorea-related articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Higher education

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Higher education, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of higher education, universities, and colleges on Wikipedia. Please visit the project page to join the discussion, and see the project's article guideline for useful advice.Higher educationWikipedia:WikiProject Higher educationTemplate:WikiProject Higher educationHigher education articles

Number of graduate students edit

Latest comment: 17 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The infobox says that there are 2274 postgraduate students, but the history section says there are 7,600 graduate students. Which figure is accurate? YooChung 00:17, 10 March 2007 (UTC)Reply

Problems with page edit

Latest comment: 8 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Someone reverted all of the tagging I did on this page which pointed out problems, including all of the HTML comments I put in, but not all of the issues were addressed. Problems that still remain are:

"In the 1960s and 1970s, Hanyang University graduates, particularly those from the College of Engineering, led the way in Korea's national drive for industrialization and modernization." — "Lead the way" is obviously a biased statement. It needs to be specific on what this means and written in a neutral manner.
"In the 1990s, Hanyang University continued both research and the extensive training of fully qualified professionals." — Unless the university didn't do research or train professionals before the 1990s, this is a redundant statement whose purpose is seems to be putting the university in a positive light.
Several sections do not use wiki markup.
Links to the Korean and Chinese versions of the university website are easily available from the English version, so they're redundant.

--Somde123 (talk) 00:52, 11 April 2016 (UTC)Reply

New problems I noted:

The "Alumni" section is a cut-and-paste from the school website, which is a copyright violation.
This is my personal preference, but comparisons or rankings against other universities might be better off being based on independent sources instead of the school website. (I don't have a problem about facts on only the university being sourced from the university website.)
Some of the images, presumably copyrighted by the university, have no indication that permission has been obtained for using them.
References do not use full citations.