Talk:Hanna Rosin

keep

I'm voting for a keep. There's no way to prove she wrote it herself. It's definitely suspicious, but there's no way to counter a claim that Plotz wrote it and that it's therefore totally legit. They're a married couple, so that IP would have been the same either way. Everyone should just chill Mardiste (talk) 23:16, 27 June 2010 (UTC).

Huh? Is this apropos of anything at all? --CAVincent (talk) 05:49, 29 June 2010 (UTC)

It's a propos of the allegation that she wrote her own Wikipedia entry. Mardiste (talk) 20:40, 16 September 2011 (UTC)

She most likely did, since this article is obviously sanitized. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.131.153.242 (talk) 03:49, 4 January 2014 (UTC)

college?

I can find no record of HR attending college. Is it possible that she is not a college graduate? Hedgehogfox (talk) 18:19, 4 April 2011 (UTC)

Stanford University. Answered my own question. Hedgehogfox (talk) 21:07, 9 April 2011 (UTC)

Folks,

I knew Hanna well in high school and have followed her career. All of this is accurate. She was in fact, with her partner David Coleman (at Stuyvesant High School), by far the best debate "duo" in the United States in 1986 and 1987. She and David were the only team that my partner and I never managed to beat. Hanna went to Stanford, for sure. David, also my friend, went to Yale. Then Hanna went to work for The New Republic...after that I lost track. But the early stuff is definitely true.

Devin Hosea devin@alumni.princeton.edu bio: http://www.linkedin.com/in/devinhosea

---

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Devinhosea (talk • contribs) 05:53, 1 September 2011 (UTC)

Sales figures? Failure?

The use of book sales figures from Nielsen Book Scan here is problematic, and raises both NPOV and WP policy on living persons ("Criticism and praise should be included if they can be sourced to reliable secondary sources, so long as the material is presented responsibly, conservatively, and in a disinterested tone."). It's impossible to say from raw sales figures whether a book was a "success" or not; a book may garner good reviews, but not sell as well as expected, and the proportion of sales to expected sales, or advances, would be important too. Unless some outside, impartial reliable source, such as Publisher's Weekly, says the sales were poor or disappointing, I think this article should not opine on the matter -- don't think the figures themselves should be used but would like more input on that issue from others. Clevelander96 (talk) 17:39, 1 September 2013 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Hanna Rosin. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071106071940/http://www.dailyprincetonian.com/archives/2005/11/11/news/13760.shtml to http://www.dailyprincetonian.com/archives/2005/11/11/news/13760.shtml

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:36, 25 May 2017 (UTC)

Bibliography

I have commenced a tidy-up of the Bibliography section using cite templates. Capitalization and punctuation follow standard cataloguing rules in AACR2 and RDA, as much as Wikipedia templates allow it. ISBNs and other persistent identifiers, where available, are commented out, but still available for reference. This is a work in progress; feel free to continue. Sunwin1960 (talk) 06:23, 13 May 2020 (UTC)