This article is within the scope of WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North America, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Native Americans, Indigenous peoples in Canada, and related indigenous peoples of North America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Indigenous peoples of North AmericaWikipedia:WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North AmericaTemplate:WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North AmericaIndigenous peoples of North America articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
The following Wikipedia contributor may be personally or professionally connected to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view.
Hello, As I said in reply to your template and message on my TP, no it didn't work and no I did not re-add it, I simply added it. But they are not empty citations, they're useful, reliable and were sourcing the material you removed. Here are the urlS:
Feel free to try and insert them with the Citeweb template and see for yourself the result, if you have time. If you don't have time or interest, I might do it myself someday. Best,
— MY, OH, MY! (mushy yank) — 19:49, 30 May 2023 (UTC)Reply
Clarification: In removing multiple citations that didn't source the content, I thought I had removed all cites to the empty AFI page and you were putting them back; I had actually left one in the infobox, but flagged it as not citing the content it was used for.[1] You didn't actually "re" add the citation, but you removed the "content not in source / failed verification" flag, and then used the failed citation twice in the article.[2] The links you just posted above are not what you used in the article. As to my tone, you came and removed the call for citations but have done some odd edits that didn't really meet the sourcing criteria. So if I sound terse, that's why. - CorbieVreccan☊☼20:29, 30 May 2023 (UTC)Reply