Talk:Hank Risan
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Hank Risan article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Is this a balanced, verifiable article? edit
Leaving aside the fact that this article was probably incorrect accepted by an editor who is now banned from editing, I'm concerned that there is no independent scientific basis for the claims made concerning 'Psycho-Acoustic simulations' indeed this paragraph in particular is not independently referenced at all, and so should probably be removed. I think the article needs significant work to put forward a balanced viewpoint, if it is to be retained, but i'd like to get opinions from other editors so starting a discussion here. There are a number of sources of commentary on the case that are not referenced that probably should be - the judge's description of "technobabble and doublespeak" reported at ArsTechnica article is just one such example. Welcome any input --nonsense ferret 20:07, 7 March 2013 (UTC)